The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Observations in a World of Divergent and Opportunistic Opinions

“Are you a vegetarian or non-vegetarian?” asked the waiter at the hotel to my colleague Swami. This question always confuses him. “I am a vegetarian mostly, but I can eat chicken, except on Tuesday and Friday. So, it depends on what everyone else is ordering”, he replied. Such responses always confuse waiters in hotels, who … Read more

The Projection and Protection Approaches to Stock Selection

“Researching and selecting your own stocks is not necessary; for most people, it is not even advisable. However, some investors do enjoy the diversion and intellectual challenge of picking individual stocks – and, if you have survived a bear market and still enjoy picking stocks, then nothing that Graham or I could say will dissuade … Read more

Book Synopsis: Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits by Philip Fisher

“Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits” is a masterpiece compilation of writings by the legendary investor Philip Fisher – the father of growth investing.

A complete opposite of Graham and the theory of value investment, Fisher proposed a set of 15 ‘scuttlebutt’ principles that work as a checklist for investors to evaluate companies for growth investing. There are very few companies that consistently meet the criteria of being growth companies over the long-term, and his 15 criteria act as the guide for qualifying them.

Fisher’s way of investing is to identify great growth companies and hold them forever or for as long as possible.

His basic premise is that the best long term investments are companies that have products and services with large markets, a strong research function to keep coming up with newer products from time to time, an effective sales engine, high profit margins, and are run by happy employees and leaders of integrity.

In case one is able to identify such companies, how much you pay for it does not matter so much as long as it is not completely unreasonable, as per Fisher.

Of course, such a lethal combination is tough to find. Therefore, his view is – if one finds them, hold them forever.

One is more likely to find companies with these qualities and such stature in the large cap end of the market – and if one is fortunate enough to identify something like this when it is not large enough, it will multiply investments many times over.

Texas Instruments and Motorola were two such investments that worked well for Fisher – both of which he bought in the early 1950’s and held on almost till his death in early 2000’s. Obviously if you could find it, the young growth company is the best bet for superlative gains. But such scenarios are rare and also impractical.

Hence, in what to buy, Fisher says it is best if small as well as large investors stick to relatively large growth companies.

Regarding the decision on when to buy a company stock, Fisher has an unusual recommendation. His premise is that the best time to buy a growth company is when its new product development is going into production. That is when a fairly large growth is in store, which most people are unaware of.

So he does not get into pricing or valuation of companies as the basis for purchase, but relies more on the stage within the company for timing purchase.

Regarding the decision on when to sell, Fisher says – almost never. Investors make a number of mistakes which come in the way of uncommon profits, like selling too soon, or selling when it has gone up quite a bit – or selling in the expectation of overall market downtrend. All of which are mistakes with heavy penalties as per Fisher.

When thinking of selling a growth stock, think of yourself on your graduation day from college. Let’s say you are to choose only 3 classmates who you will ‘buy’ by paying them what they would earn in the first twelve months of working, in return for which they would give you quarter of their earnings thereafter for the rest of their lives.

Think of growth stocks like that, is what Fisher says. It would be foolish for an investor to sell a growth stock either because it is going through a tough time, or if it has given stupendous returns.

The only reasons why a growth stock should be sold is if one realizes one has made a mistake, or if the company does not qualify on one or more of the 15 scuttlebutt criteria, or if you find a relatively better growth stock. Basically if the choice is correctly made, it means that one should sell almost never.

Some of Fisher’s views on buying cheap companies and dividends are completely in contrast with Graham’s quantitative approach to value investing. Most of Fisher’s assessment is qualitative.

A pure value investor may not agree with his theories, perhaps finds them outrageous too, but he has consistently used them over 70 years and with great results.

His complete disregard to value metrics such as low price earnings or low price to book value as the basis of stock selection, and strong emphasis on growth as the only basis for long term profits is full of conviction.

Both value and growth approaches have been equally effective in their own ways and, Fisher and Graham have been legends on their own.

It is, therefore, testimony that there is no single way to successful investing.

The father of growth investing – in the end – summarizes his philosophy by a very succinct quotation from Julius Caesar which I reproduce here – “There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.” That is perhaps Fisher’s formula for uncommon profits from common stocks.

Insurance is not Investment

It is an indication of the sorry state of affairs in investor education that market linked insurance schemes get more fund inflows than mutual funds. The war between the capital market and insurance regulators was never fully resolved, though it led to some changes in structure of market linked insurance plans, and perhaps a lesser … Read more

The End of Magic: Tribute to the Last of Harry Potter

Avada Kedavra said Voldemort for the last time yesterday, and in the final battle, when the curse rebounded, it signified the last victory of Harry over his evil bete noire. The audience applauded heartily for the final time, and as my son and I left the cinema hall, he was left with an empty feeling that this was indeed the end.

harry-vs-voldemortMy son was just born when the first hints of Potter-mania hit the world, and to that extent, we have been late entrants into the Potter club – only perhaps for a year or so. But in that year, Harry, Ron and Hermoine along with Dumbledore, Snape and the entire professor-hood of Hogwarts, plus Voldemort and his Death-eaters had well and truly taken over our household. In a relatively short period of a year, reading all the seven books one by one, some of them twice, and then watching each of the first seven moves at least twice, my son had become a walking encyclopedia on Potter and his gang. And doing what only a 10 year old Potter fan can do, he had successfully converted his parents, both his sets of grand parents and perhaps most of his friends in to die hard Potter fans too.

It was then that I realised how much of a void the end of this last movie is likely to create in a generation of children (and their parents) that grew up on Harry Potter. Right from mesmerising children with the initiation in the early couple of movies (which most people watched agape) to almost frightening their parents in the last two Deathly Hallows, the rivalry of good and evil in a world of magic cast its spell on a generation of children. The last few months our home has been full of children making wands from broken twigs playing ‘Expelliarmus’ with each other, riding on imaginary broomsticks playing quidditch with their snitches taking roles of Harry, Ron and Draco, and calling their parents ‘Muggles’. As the early playfulness of the three friends quickly matured into an intense plot of rivalry, the games suitably changed with the early characters of schoolmates being replaced with Dumbledore, Snape and Voldemort and his deatheaters.

But beyond the now familiar spells, characters and the world of magic that Rowling and the movies based on her books took us into, there are some amazing subtle hints of wisdom that she threw at children – through the words of some amazing characters, specially Dumbledore and sometime Sirius Black and Severus Snape.  Like when Dumbledore tells Harry in the Chamber of Secrets: “It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities.” Or tells him in the Prisoner of Azkaban: “Happiness can be found, even in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.” Or when Sirius Black advises Harry in the Goblet of Fire: “If you want to know what a man’s like, take a good look at how he treats his inferiors, not his equals.” And finally the one that I heard Dumbledore say yesterday in the Deathly Hallows when Harry asks him whether this is real or it is happening in his head: “Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”

CA.0802.harry.potter.hallows.2.For mere ‘muggles’ who have not quite experienced this magic, it has always been a puzzle what the fuss is all about. But for those who have had this potion, it is always a case of the charms taking over. Finally it all ends – as far as the books and the movies are concerned. But it will continue to stay with this generation forever. Perhaps by some spell of magic, it may get a rebirth too. So till we meet again on platform number 9 and a 3/4, this is indeed the end of magic as we know it.

Is your house an asset?

“The outright ownership of real estate has long been considered as a sound long term investment, carrying with it a goodly amount of protection against inflation. Unfortunately, real estate values are also subject to wide fluctuations; serious errors can be made in location, price paid etc. Finally, diversification is not practical for the investor of … Read more

How should I select which stocks to invest in?

“To obtain better than average investment results over a long pull requires a policy of selection or operation possessing a twofold merit: 1) it must meet objective or rational tests of underlying soundness, and 2) it must be different from the policy followed by most investors or speculators.”- The Intelligent Investor In the area of … Read more

Why age-based asset allocation is mostly wrong

“Thus we return to the statement made at the outset, that the kind of securities to be purchased and the rate of return to be sought depend not on the investor’s financial resources but on his financial equipment in terms of knowledge, experience and temperament.”- The Intelligent Investor A lot of financial planners advise an … Read more

Ranjit’s Newsletter

Loading